<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sample Scientific Posters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.artofspeakingscience.com/2007/04/13/sample-scientific-posters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.artofspeakingscience.com/2007/04/13/sample-scientific-posters/</link>
	<description>Communication tips for sciences and technology professionals. Improve your conference talks, poster presentations, interview skills, conflict management, networking skills, and public speaking.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Madraida</title>
		<link>http://www.artofspeakingscience.com/2007/04/13/sample-scientific-posters/#comment-2201</link>
		<dc:creator>Madraida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artofspeakingscience.com/2007/04/13/sample-scientific-posters/#comment-2201</guid>
		<description>The posters on the last two websites you mentioned contains too much text.  Those would have to be really huge posters (ceiling to floor?) to contain that much text and still be comfortably readable.

I go for less.  Information has to be distilled to its most basic.  The intro/purpose/significance should be just 3 to 5 short-medium length sentences.

In the Results section, just choose the most relevant results/discussion instead of trying to squeeze a huge project into that small space.  

But that's just me.  I tend to be a minimalist when it comes to posters.  Seeing so much clutter on a poster makes me dizzy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The posters on the last two websites you mentioned contains too much text.  Those would have to be really huge posters (ceiling to floor?) to contain that much text and still be comfortably readable.</p>
<p>I go for less.  Information has to be distilled to its most basic.  The intro/purpose/significance should be just 3 to 5 short-medium length sentences.</p>
<p>In the Results section, just choose the most relevant results/discussion instead of trying to squeeze a huge project into that small space.  </p>
<p>But that&#8217;s just me.  I tend to be a minimalist when it comes to posters.  Seeing so much clutter on a poster makes me dizzy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
